Agricultural Engineering Student Projects Focus on Practical Solutions

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Agricultural Engineering Student Projects Focus on Practical Solutions


Agricultural Engineering Student Projects Focus on Practical Solutions



A low-cost secondary containment system for mini-bulks. A sprayer for your ATV. A blower to

keep the feederhouse clean on a combine. A way to evenly apply pesticides to grain going into a

bin. These were just four of the ten Agricultural Systems Management senior capstone projects

displayed at Purdue University last week.

“My goal was to develop something that had utility for a farmer,” said Ross

Chapman, regarding the feederhouse debris cleaning system he and colleagues

developed. “Compared to older models, the

feederhouses on later, bigger models are wide,

allowing plant residues build up—the accumulation

blocks your view, and it becomes a safety hazard.

Anyone who has ever worked around a combine

knows how slick those surfaces can become.”

Feederhouse Debris Cleaner. Chapman and

classmates tried three different fan systems—ones

that could be powered mechanically, hydraulically,

and electrically. Each engaged with the header

control, and was designed to withstand the tough

environment that would be present at the interface

of the combine and the header. The electric fan

option, moving 400 cubic feet of air per minute

proved to be the least expensive with materials

costing less than $200, and was adaptable to

multiple makes and models of combines. There were complications with rigging up the mechanical

and hydraulic options, with parts pricing in the $500 range.

Pesticide Containment. This team was charged with designing an inexpensive structure to contain

an accidental spill from a mini-bulk pesticide container. Commercial containment tanks are

available but can run $1,000 or more. In the future, secondary containment structures may be

mandatory equipment for certain pesticides.

The design specifications were that the

containment structure must be made from readilyavailable

materials, be portable, have the capacity

to hold 700 gallons of a potentially corrosive

liquid, and a life span of at least ten years.

Designs using grain bin rings, hay rings, metal

stock tanks, and wooden boxes made of 4 x 4’s

and plywood all proved quite workable. But all

of these systems depended on a chemical-resistant

36 mil polypropylene liner costing $350 to $450,

making the overall cost prohibitive. If a cheaper

liner were available, all but the bin ring design



could be built for less than $500.




Utility Sprayer. Revamping a sprayer to be

mounted into a John Deere gator was the goal of

this team. The group started with a three-point,

PTO driven sprayer with manual controls to one

that could be easily moved into and out of a gator,

for maximum utility.

The finished sprayer unit was wired through the

cigarette adapter and featured a 5 GPM, 45 PSI

12-volt pump, ten-foot boom and a 50-foot

retractable hose and gun on a reel. Other features

included a spray monitor with pressure control,

solenoid controlled valves for the boom and spray

gun, and quick and easy cleanout.

Grain Pesticide Applicator. Pesticides applied

to grain going into a bin are often treated with a single nozzle mounted above the auger hopper,

often resulting in poor distribution on the grain. The purpose of this project was to convert a rotary

screen grain cleaner into a rotating pesticide applicator, in hopes of converting potentially unused

equipment into an inexpensive way to evenly apply pesticides.

The original screen enclosure of the grain cleaner was replaced with a Plexiglas enclosure for

observation, but sheet metal could be used as well. Nozzles were selected to apply a rate in step

with the rate of grain flow into the cleaner, and then videos were taken to see how grain flowed

through the cleaner. A variable rate controller was tested to adjust rates for variances in grain input.

After the judges left and the ballots were counted, the team with the utility sprayer had won.

According to Gaines Miles, Professor of Agricultural and Biological Engineering and advisor to

these students, “this was an especially hard-working

group—and resulted in some of the most innovative

projects that we have ever had.” Other projects included

a convenient trailer for ATVs, the relative precision and

accuracy of GPS receivers, and a sweet corn harvesting

system.

No comments:

Post a Comment